80

The Art in Influence Issue

21.06.2012

Guest
Editor

By Mother’s artist in residence Mary Stephenson


The world of art is intriguing and multi-faceted. This also applies to the artists themselves too. So this week Mother’s very own artist in resident, Mary Stephenson, shares an insight into the art world, her influences and a bit of her work. Find out about invisible art, her life as an art student and the thinking behind some of her own portraits in a sort of personal art memoir.


+

The monochromatic billboard   

 
Two years ago, on my first visit to New York, I was walking down the Highline with my twin sister and close friend. Probably mindlessly gabbling on about our next meal or hysterically taking pictures of “you and me”, or “ you and me over here”, and always “shoot from above, shoot from above!” when I was wonderfully stopped in my tracks by what, to this day, I would call is my favourite piece of art.
 
Felix Gonzalez Torres was a Cuban born, New York based artist known for his minimal and deteriorative installations and sculpture.





 
 


The piece that caught my eye, heart and throat, was Untitled (1991).  

It is a billboard sized monochromatic photograph that depicts the pillows of his and partner, Ross Laycock’s, unmade bed.  An overpowering and evocative image, it conjures an instant absence: a being and then removal of bodies.

A loving memorial to his late partner Ross Layock, who passed away to AIDS.
 
It is a simple image that shows the purity of a bed and the ease of 2 people sharing it, who ever they may be.

My walk down the Highline that day was to be my most moving art experience. It taught me the amazing power of scale and how it can dramatically affect the impact of a piece of work.




 
 


Gonzalez’s simple image becomes all-consuming because of its intense and spectacular appearance.

Perhaps there is a lesson in his work for the advertising world.
 

+

 

Invisible art at the Hayward

How can you “view” the invisible? Yes your imagination can conjure up some wonderful things with words, smell and touch to help, but is this really enough?
 
These were the things I recently asked myself as at a recent gallery visit to the Hayward.
 
So with a preempted heavy head of cynicism on my shoulders, ready to pounce with eyes-a-rolling, I walked into the empty room of the gallery.
 
Painter and performer, Yves Klein, portrayed his invisible art in a short film. Standing in a white room, he framed empty spaces on the wall with his hands, inviting you to view “nothingness”. A delightful little film; successful in its purity; organic and original, of its time (the 1960’s) but also fresh and current.
 








 
 


But arguably, it is the support of Klein’s slightly unusual manner and rather striking, attractive face that brings this otherwise uninspiring film to life. I mean put a handsome man in an empty room and I’ll watch it, (psst…Clooney give the Hayward a call!)Before entering a cornered off room, its description promised “an abnormal normality”. Its then when you’re standing in an empty room, with the humming of 2 aircon machines blowing in your face, you feel, well…rather stupid (and cold). Wow, how underwhelming is a room of “abnormal normality”.

Yet as you leave you can’t help but snigger and quietly congratulate the artist for getting away with it. It is the audiences inclination to be pessimistic about the work that becomes humorous once your in it and yet by going to the exhibition, you are if you like it or not, accepting that it is valid.
 
Another piece that left me wanting to high-five the artist for being a clever old prankster was that of Jay Chung. Directing a whole short film, with no film in the camera, with only a cast and crew photo to document this event.


 

 
 “This could be my big break!” they scream with their eyes, I think not my friend; you may be a fine actor but your mate Chung is a better liar.  

The successes at this exhibition were in the stories, being able to conjure wonderful visuals with the cleverly written opaque descriptions along the gallery walls. The great failure for me was the showing of excessive amounts of pieces of blank paper of “invisible drawings”. Indeed a blank canvas is the basis of many great ideas, but in this instance, the empty walls and my own imagination were enough, the paper cluttered my experience.
 
The exhibition runs until 5th August, you can get tickets here.
 

+


 

Etch-a-sketch art

So everyone remembers fighting over the Etch-a-Sketch with their annoying little brother, nudging each other so their depiction of Mr. Potato Head was all messed up.
 
Well amazingly so, in the trendy days of 2012, where all things 60s, 70s, 80s and 90’s are being revamped in a stylized ever-so-ironic -and-trendy way, inventor Ari Krupnik has done just this and rebirthed the 1960s phenomenon onto your iPad!
 
Etch A Sketch was a mechanical drawing toy designed by French inventor André Cassagnes in the 1960s,




 


it was a brilliant way of quickly drawing and creating weird and wonderful throw-away drawings.  It was also the perfect way to show off to all your friends. I remember having many a competition with my twin sister; indeed we already radiated competitiveness, Who’s taller? Who had longer, blonder hair? (I have to say I always won that one, until recently where I won for having the shortest hair! Yes!)
 
But one fine day I smacked her drawing right out of the park with an intricate although monochromatic drawing of Super Mario. Alas, for all you know I could be lying, at the peak of my twin rivalry success, it was shook away!
 
…Ah well, I guess for now I’ll have to get a crew cut and reign on that victory. Of course today no such thing should happen, not with Krupik’s iPad app anyway - emailing,


 
 
 


Facebook-uploading, twitter-enabled etcha-sketching is guaranteed. But does that take the magic away from the etch-a-sketch, should they be kept? Check out this wonderful gallery of etch-a-sketches and make your own mind up.

+

 

Life as an art student

Art students, maybe some of the most self-absurd bunch that ever walked this land?
 
Indeed a lot of art school can be a bit of a doss, I admit, hands held high, I spent my first week at art school jumping on one leg with my eyes closed, drawing my feelings, emotions, (burning calf muscles) on a massive piece of paper dramatically masked across the wall, “It was like totally next level conceptual dude”
 
Fancy dress parties were never as simple as “”pimps and hoes”, oh no in art school that was far too obvious.






 


Many a night was spent planning, “if you were a art movement what would you be?”, emptying out cereal boxes was a quick fire to Cubism.
 
We would stroll down the street with ripped shirts and scruffy topknots, “oh Mary you’ve got a bit of charcoal on your face”, ”really? How embarrassing”, inside I thought (with a little imaginary victory punch in the air), “I look so “arty””.
 
But over time the charm of oil paint eye-shadow and jumble sale clothing wore off. The excessive consumption of mung beans, chickpeas and all things zen became tiresome.
 
So Instead we took up being ever so self aware and socially concerned. Everyone adopted a cat they found in their stairwell, marched, protested and signed petitions.
 
 

 
 


Nevertheless, always making time for a great art school party… You could tell it was going be a good night when Impressionism and Surrealism joined forces on the dance floor.
 
Love em or hat em, the world wouldn’t be the same without art students. After all who would drink all the cheap red wine and gin?
 

+





 

The theatre of portraiture

Finally I wanted to round off by telling you about my work…
 
Of all the art forms I’ve always loved portraiture the most. However, as soon as I went to art school I felt an overwhelming pressure to explore the deepest darkest and quirkiest recesses of conceptual art. A highlight was the “twins”, “twinness” or my all time favourite, “twinology” (my teacher insisted she did not make this word up, I was chasing grades I couldn’t possibly disagree) period.
 
But after years of smashing up mirrors and poaching eggs in baths (I kid you not) in almost a full circle I returned to portraiture, 



 
 


just as I had done in the beginning.When I make my portraits I spend a long time with my subjects discovering what are the most important things in their lives. Then I build a set, a stage, showing their favourite places, filled with their prized possessions, music, food, books, their things; the architecture of their lives.
 
In the above, unlike the opulent array of lutes and skulls in Holbein’s The Ambassadors, my dear old mum is surrounded by her “Funky Divas” and Gill-Scott Heron cassettes, amongst an appalling clutter of fizzy drinks, paper garlic, pans and pasta, the cultural attaché of her own kitchen floor.
 
Everything is built from paper, card and then hand painted, crafted with precision and care. The subjects however are all too solid flesh.
 
 
 
 
 
 


I believe there is a wonderful element of theater to portraiture and with mine; I aim to depict the stage within which these people live and perform.
 
This is something I take forward into my work at Mother.
 

+



 
About the Author

Mary graduated from the Glasgow School of Art in 2011, BA Hons Painting & Printmaking. From there she headed straight for Mother as the work experience girl, then onto a Mother Runner, before becoming a proud production assistant. Not bad for a year’s work.
 
http://marystephenson.tumblr.com/

Credits

Lead Image. Mary’s own work; Story 1. Untitled (1991) by Felix Jonzalez Torres via this blog; Story 2. Via Haward Gallery; Story 3. Image by Sigmoidal from Etch-a-Sketch gallery; Story 4. Image from Ding Dang: Story 5. Mary’s own work.